Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Small change for epatch_user() in eutils.eclass
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:17:55
Message-Id: 201201291416.15106.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Small change for epatch_user() in eutils.eclass by Ulrich Mueller
1 On Sunday 29 January 2012 06:22:02 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
2 > epatch_user() currently looks into <CATEGORY>/<PF|P|PN> subdirectories
3 > of /etc/portage/patches. If the package has no revision, then PF and P
4 > are identical, so there's no way to specify that a patch should only
5 > apply to -r0.
6 >
7 > The patch below changes ${PF} to ${P}-${PR}. Behaviour should be
8 > identical for all non-zero revisions. For -r0 it will look in ${P}-r0
9 > first, then in ${P} and ${PN}, as before.
10
11 looks fine. gogogogogogogogo.
12 -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Small change for epatch_user() in eutils.eclass Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>