| 1 |
Am Sonntag, den 08.03.2009, 17:22 +0100 schrieb Robert Buchholz: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 08 March 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Hi everyone |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > With eapis 1 and 2 we introduced nice features but also a couple of |
| 6 |
> > new problems. One of them are the use dependencies when the package |
| 7 |
> > you depend on doesn't have the use flag anymore (see [1] for an |
| 8 |
> > example). |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > So I think it's time for a short eapi bump with some distinct |
| 11 |
> > improvements: |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pPAJXP6shYH78lCXeqRqCUQ |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I'm not sure if you would like to discuss items to be added to the |
| 16 |
> spreadsheet on this list first, but I accidently added |
| 17 |
> default_src_install (bug 33544) to the list. I did not know it would |
| 18 |
> store and share changes immediately. |
| 19 |
This accident was intended ;-) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> However, the proposed implementation on the bug does not follow the |
| 22 |
> ideas of adding arguments to the default_src_* implementations |
| 23 |
> (230725). |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Still, I think adding the default src_install function to EAPI=3 would |
| 26 |
> be both trivial and an improvement for many simple ebuilds. |
| 27 |
Fine by me. I didn't add this bug because I thought that the discussion |
| 28 |
about it could get too controversal and thus not suited for a fast |
| 29 |
release of a new eapi (mainly thought to be fixing bugs). |
Archives