| 1 |
On 15-12-2009 09:54:36 -0700, Denis Dupeyron wrote: |
| 2 |
> I will be following up discussions on various mailing lists to prepare |
| 3 |
> the agenda. If you already want to suggest topics feel free to reply |
| 4 |
> to this thread. You'll get a second chance with the meeting reminder |
| 5 |
> approximately two weeks before the meeting. I will be sending a |
| 6 |
> message about the two topics which did not make it last time and |
| 7 |
> explain why. I should have sent that much earlier but well... you |
| 8 |
> know... |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I'd like to council to discuss the current *$^&!! policy of |
| 11 |
-dev-announce and -dev. I'd propose to at least implement the following |
| 12 |
behaviour such that I: |
| 13 |
- don't have to see some mails 3 (!) times and many 2 times |
| 14 |
- don't get lost where the mail is/was |
| 15 |
- get broken threading because the original mail was sent to another |
| 16 |
list |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Proposed behaviour: |
| 19 |
Aautomatically send all mail sent to -dev-announce to -dev. |
| 20 |
Benefits: |
| 21 |
- any reply-to hackery for -dev-announce to -dev unnecessary |
| 22 |
- being subscrived to -dev alone is enough (alternatively -dev-announce |
| 23 |
can be /dev/null-ed) |
| 24 |
- threads are complete, instead of scattered over some lists |
| 25 |
- multiple copies can be avoided |
| 26 |
- cross-list posting can be reduced to a minimum |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 31 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives