Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 16:07:01
Message-Id: 20091220144909.GB840@gentoo.org
On 15-12-2009 09:54:36 -0700, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> I will be following up discussions on various mailing lists to prepare > the agenda. If you already want to suggest topics feel free to reply > to this thread. You'll get a second chance with the meeting reminder > approximately two weeks before the meeting. I will be sending a > message about the two topics which did not make it last time and > explain why. I should have sent that much earlier but well... you > know...
I'd like to council to discuss the current *$^&!! policy of -dev-announce and -dev. I'd propose to at least implement the following behaviour such that I: - don't have to see some mails 3 (!) times and many 2 times - don't get lost where the mail is/was - get broken threading because the original mail was sent to another list Proposed behaviour: Aautomatically send all mail sent to -dev-announce to -dev. Benefits: - any reply-to hackery for -dev-announce to -dev unnecessary - being subscrived to -dev alone is enough (alternatively -dev-announce can be /dev/null-ed) - threads are complete, instead of scattered over some lists - multiple copies can be avoided - cross-list posting can be reduced to a minimum -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Replies