1 |
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> It is a bit hard to document a generic testing process. Each package |
3 |
> has different requirements. We tried to document a generic workflow in |
4 |
> amd64 AT[1] and in the AT quiz as well. |
5 |
|
6 |
Sure, and that's pretty much the method I use, and I imagine most arch |
7 |
testers/devs use. However, in most cases I tend to just find it |
8 |
easier to do everything manually than to use the tools, even though I |
9 |
might want to use a tool. I guess the AT job just isn't that hard to |
10 |
begin with, and the last thing I want is some tool posting in bugs or |
11 |
committing something because I didn't catch something in the |
12 |
documentation. |
13 |
|
14 |
Rich |