| 1 |
El jue, 11-08-2016 a las 13:15 +0300, Mart Raudsepp escribió: |
| 2 |
> [...] |
| 3 |
> It should be kept for the purposes of coordination between different |
| 4 |
> specific desktop projects and the grouping of them it provides as |
| 5 |
> subprojects. |
| 6 |
> However that doesn't mean it should have any packages in the tree |
| 7 |
> that |
| 8 |
> the desktop projects maintains itself personally, instead of one of |
| 9 |
> its |
| 10 |
> subprojects. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> One of my gentoo plans, when I have time, has been in reviving such |
| 13 |
> desktop-wide coordinations, possibly under the desktop project |
| 14 |
> banner. |
| 15 |
> E.g my started USE=gui and toolkit threads when I had time. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Frankly, it would be weird to not have a project that broadly manages |
| 18 |
> all the desktop stuff. |
| 19 |
> We should manage this all better under a broad desktop project that |
| 20 |
> manages documentation, some policies, etc, but doesn't necessarily |
| 21 |
> have |
| 22 |
> any packages that it maintains in tree. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> If we need a new lead election per GLEP 39, I'm sure we have some |
| 25 |
> volunteers from the subprojects to throw their name in, that are |
| 26 |
> interested in having a good desktop-wide organization going on. |
| 27 |
> Myself |
| 28 |
> included. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Mart |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Apart of me not understanding why are we reviving this that was already |
| 35 |
discussed when killing the old freedesktop-bugs herds in favor of the |
| 36 |
correct project, I don't think it makes sense to keep this concrete |
| 37 |
dead project for that potential and hypothetical changes that could |
| 38 |
benefit from it in the far future. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Maybe when something of that is finally going to be done, we need that |
| 41 |
project and, in that case, you will be able of course to create your |
| 42 |
Project following the standard policy that allows to do that to any |
| 43 |
developers. |
Archives