| 1 |
mine ended up spitting out large amounts of gibberish.... and ruining |
| 2 |
the readability of the terminal... why would it be so different? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 8/22/05, Tavis Ormandy <taviso@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> --On Monday, August 22, 2005 08:18:42 +0100 Tavis Ormandy |
| 8 |
> <taviso@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > --On Monday, August 22, 2005 00:21:16 +0000 Renat Lumpau |
| 13 |
> <rl03@g.o> |
| 14 |
> > wrote: |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 12:08:00AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 17 |
> >>> Thanks. The other useful one is to see whether it does 256 colours |
| 18 |
> >>> properly like real xterm does. The following bash script, when run with |
| 19 |
> >>> '256' as its argument, should look the same as it does when run under |
| 20 |
> >>> a real xterm. |
| 21 |
> >> |
| 22 |
> >> Not even close here. |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > Your script produces 256 different colours here, the shades dont match |
| 25 |
> > xterm's exactly, but there are definitely 256 distinct colours. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> <http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/256-colours-match-xterm.html> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Ahh, apparently it matches an old version, but they plan to update it. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Tavis. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> -- |
| 34 |
> ------------------------------------- |
| 35 |
> taviso@××××××××××××.org | finger me for my gpg key. |
| 36 |
> ------------------------------------------------------- |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> -- |
| 39 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives