| 1 |
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:13:44 -0400 |
| 2 |
"Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 5 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> On 07/21/2010 12:11 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
| 8 |
> > = Alternative A = * first maintainer from the top down gets to be |
| 9 |
> > assignee, * otherwise the first herd gets to be assignee. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Thanks for the info. Just one point of clarification. How does the |
| 12 |
> "otherwise" work. If we have herds listed before maintainers, do you |
| 13 |
> still assign to the first maintainer? In other words, do you only |
| 14 |
> default to the first herd if there are no maintainers listed at all? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
* "When metadata.xml lists a single maintainer or herd, then you assign |
| 17 |
the bug to that maintainer or herd. When the file lists multiple |
| 18 |
entries, then you assign the bug to the first maintainer, and CC the |
| 19 |
other maintainer(s) and herd(s). If you find that metadata.xml lists |
| 20 |
inappropriate and/or confusing contact information, then make a note |
| 21 |
of that in a comment on the bug report and assign/CC the bug report as |
| 22 |
optimal as possible."[1] |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
jer |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
[1] |
| 29 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/bug-wranglers/index.xml#doc_chap4_sect3 |
Archives