1 |
On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 19:58:13 -0400 |
2 |
"William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 00:49:57 +0100 |
4 |
> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
> > On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 19:39:33 -0400 |
6 |
> > "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote: |
7 |
> > > The two ways are not the same, and there is a reason sets exist in |
8 |
> > > the first place. People seem to be over looking that fact. I did |
9 |
> > > not add sets. They are not new. I am simply trying to expand |
10 |
> > > their use. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > Sets exist because people keep saying "let's have sets!" without |
13 |
> > agreeing on what sets actually are or how they are to be used. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Do they need to agree? Isn't Gentoo about choice? Maybe your use of |
16 |
> sets is different from mine. Is that not acceptable to have choice? |
17 |
|
18 |
Well yes, they do need to agree, because otherwise when two different |
19 |
developers put sets in a profile expecting different effects, then at |
20 |
least two developers are going to end up confused, disappointed, and |
21 |
quite probably breaking user systems. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Ciaran McCreesh |