Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: Jason Stubbs <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] making dodoc and dohtml die when they fail and stricter is on
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:56:12
Message-Id: 916873797.20051226145303@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] making dodoc and dohtml die when they fail and stricter is on by Jason Stubbs
1 26.12.2005, 14:28:12, Jason Stubbs wrote:
2
3 > On Monday 26 December 2005 20:01, Jakub Moc wrote:
4 >> >> Currently there are quite a few ebuilds in the tree that execute dodoc
5 >> >> or dohtml for files that do not exist. I think it would be nice to have
6 >> >> ebuilds die if this is the case. To not break current ebuilds this would
7 >> >> only happen with FEATURES="stricter".
8 >>
9 >> Sigh... There are already bugs flowing in for TEXTRELs/executable stacks
10 >> checks implemented in recent portage versions. Some of these bugs are
11 >> completely INVALID or CANTFIX - emulation stuff, binary-only ebuilds, etc.
12 >> etc.
13
14 > Sigh... None of these issues have made there way to dev-portage.
15
16 > --
17 > Jason Stubbs
18
19 Well, then assign Bug 116499 or Bug 116602 to yourself (qemu), there're
20 textrels in openoffice-bin, mozilla-firefox-bin (upstream, don't hold your
21 breath to get this fixed), acroread (cantfix really), this for sure will be
22 an issue for many games binaries, etc. While it's often upstream/cantfix, I
23 don't see much sense in making these QA checks fatal really.
24
25 --
26 Best regards,
27
28 Jakub Moc
29 mailto:jakub@g.o
30 GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
31 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
32
33 ... still no signature ;)