From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) | ||
Date: | Fri, 30 May 2008 23:16:38 | ||
Message-Id: | 20080531001631.15286d8e@snowcone | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) by Luca Barbato |
1 | On Sat, 31 May 2008 01:08:21 +0200 |
2 | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
3 | > > Except that Paludis is fine with --as-needed. |
4 | > |
5 | > Ok, then everything in the tree is covered and we can move to having |
6 | > --as-needed as default. |
7 | |
8 | Is the next version of everything in the tree covered? Have you made |
9 | sure that software isn't merely working by fluke? Is Gentoo really that |
10 | desperate to turn everyone into a ricer? |
11 | |
12 | I'd bet you could get a pretty long way by shoving -ffast-math into |
13 | CFLAGS by default before anyone would notice... |
14 | |
15 | -- |
16 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) | Roy Marples <roy@×××××××.name> |