Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, Peter Volkov <pva@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 17:43:34
Message-Id: 4CA76F25.9020303@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: .la files removal news item (GLEP 42) by Peter Volkov
1 On 10/02/2010 05:21 AM, Peter Volkov wrote:
2 > В Птн, 01/10/2010 в 12:38 -0700, Zac Medico пишет:
3 >> Maybe advise them to use post_pkg_preinst instead of post_src_install,
4 >> so it works even for binary packages.
5 >
6 > Is it possible for portage-2.1.8.x to depend on lafilefixer and add run
7 > lafilefixer (if installed) from base profile bashrc?
8
9 The profile bashrc may not be a very good place for this since it's
10 executed by all versions of portage, and thus would be redundant for
11 >=portage-2.1.9.
12
13 We can do a portage-2.1.8.4 version bump with support for running
14 lafilefixer, but this is a questionable move given that this version
15 bump will be eligible for stabilization at about the same time as
16 portage-2.1.9.13.
17 --
18 Thanks,
19 Zac

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: .la files removal news item (GLEP 42) Peter Volkov <pva@g.o>