[gentoo-dev] Re: Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo

[Steve Long]

Stephen Bennett wrote:
> Perhaps not implausible in its strictest sense, as it could be done. It
> would, however, be a monumentally stupid idea in the general case, if
> said user happened to be a contributor upstream to widely-used
> packages, or happened to discover an important security bug in such a
> package. Leaving users without important applications, or vulnerable to
> security holes, because of what is essentially a personal dislike, is
> frankly a moronic proposition.

How did this go from not allowing future contributions to *gentoo* projects
to not accepting upstream pkgs (that someone gentoo won't deal with has had
a hand in)?


-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list