Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmasking >=media-video/ffmpeg-4.0
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 15:57:46
Message-Id: 20181106165724.4efd40e3@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmasking >=media-video/ffmpeg-4.0 by Mart Raudsepp
1 On Tue, 06 Nov 2018 17:08:22 +0200
2 Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Ühel kenal päeval, T, 06.11.2018 kell 12:00, kirjutas Alexis Ballier:
5 > > On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 20:38:58 -0500
6 > > Craig Andrews <candrews@g.o> wrote:
7 > >
8 > > > I think it's time to remove the mask on >=media-video/ffmpeg-4.0
9 > > >
10 > > > ffmpeg 4 is in many distros (including Debian, Arch) and FreeBSD.
11 > > > Upstreams are starting to require it, too. For example, Kodi 18
12 > > > and
13 > > > media-plugins/gst-plugins-libav-16 will require it.
14 > > >
15 > > > The blocker issue https://bugs.gentoo.org/653678 has only 5
16 > > > blockers
17 > > > against it right now:
18 > > > * 654628 has a pull request out to fix it:
19 > > > https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/10341
20 > > > * 655170 is for a package that (IMHO) should be last-rited:
21 > > > media-libs/mediastreamer
22 > > > * 666166 is for a package that (IMHO) should be last-rited:
23 > > > media-plugins/vdr-image
24 > > > * 655442 and 658128 are for media-video/mplayer and fixed
25 > > > upstream,
26 > > > requiring a new snapshot release
27 > > >
28 > > > What do we say? Can we set a date when the hard mask will be
29 > > > removed?
30 > >
31 > >
32 > > I think 6 months qualifies for ETIMEOUT, so go ahead and unmask
33 > > it :)
34 > >
35 > > merge the github PR; I'll take care of mplayer
36 >
37 > I'm sorry, but what?
38 > PR was filed yesterday, what 6 months are you talking about here?
39 > Please respect your fellow developers. We have other commitments and
40 > priorities and can't zero-day review a PR.
41
42
43 Oh, sorry, I did not even check what the PR was about nor its
44 uptime. It should definitely read as "get the PR merged" then.
45
46 6 months is when bugs started to be filled which by most standards a
47 package not fixed within that time can be considered dead/unmaintained.
48 I usually take no response for a couple of months as a green light to
49 do it myself.
50
51
52 > It is not GStreamer fault that ffmpeg breaks API and ABI without
53 > parallel installability, much less so the distro maintainers of it.
54 > If you/upstream don't make it parallel installable, then this is what
55 > you get.
56
57
58 Are you, seriously, suggesting this is the solution to all problems
59 here ?
60
61 Bests,
62
63 Alexis.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmasking >=media-video/ffmpeg-4.0 Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>