| 1 |
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:16:53 -0700 |
| 2 |
Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Maybe what's needed to address #2 is simply to include a separate |
| 5 |
> portage changelog file, somewhere within the tree, possibly as its own |
| 6 |
> package, or in the profiles root dir, along with the global |
| 7 |
> package.mask, and use.desc and use.local.desc files. Portage could |
| 8 |
> then add an "emerge portinfo" function, similar to "emerge info", that |
| 9 |
> would spit out the "upstream" changelog between what's currently |
| 10 |
> installed, and any new version. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
or just a dodoc ChangeLog and have it tossed in the same share dir we |
| 13 |
toss upstream docs/changelogs/readmes |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
/me is not weighing in with an opinion on this, mind you, just saying |
| 16 |
there might be an even simpler way to include that info |
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives