1 |
If your going to take on spacefm, it would be great if you also handled |
2 |
udevil since they are both from the same upstream repo and work tightly |
3 |
together.. |
4 |
|
5 |
I'm an avid user of both, and since upstream is no longer maintained on |
6 |
either of these their futures are unclear.. |
7 |
|
8 |
H |
9 |
On 11/27/2014 04:51 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: |
10 |
> On 11/26/2014 03:15 AM, Yixun Lan wrote: |
11 |
>> On 21:08 Sun 23 Nov , Daniel Campbell wrote: |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> I'd like to take x11-misc/spacefm if a developer is willing to allow |
14 |
>>> me to proxy-maint until I become a developer. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> update metadata.xml, using your email found in bugzie. |
17 |
>> and current no bug opened, thanks |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> btw, any particular reason why should we keep so many stable versions? |
20 |
>> probably start doing by cleaning old versions ;-) |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
23 |
>>> Version: GnuPG v2 |
24 |
>>> |
25 |
>>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUcqEYAAoJEJUrb08JgYgHJ0IIAK+tguKdL+JxdjKLySOSJaTU |
26 |
>>> kiU1z2rBqUfPzs8VI3V8JAAL9dbSJel4h3/JdoZFpidC9jED63l5STmGXi6dp63O |
27 |
>>> 9CKqNQRt4AELfOUpQzxoD4HNHVxaA9hkiiJXgAoF9HIfKBEqczPCBKGnJb5s1WB5 |
28 |
>>> 8eQkn6t6DZMZeRV/dE6pw1RgTj1eHowu2es67V7+bHMiy2ylz5/4ru0dx+1UHvU1 |
29 |
>>> UeBBcB1IesAVxVsfpBLJoi+aZA9CO9EAriaGogzTXQPP5odr4bgIf5acxOPKGxt0 |
30 |
>>> iz62j/XgG3jTExqkP5rNaTVnO9ZZol8XPcLiAIZTEl79XU0ZOcy5LDUsJNY+9cI= |
31 |
>>> =stIL |
32 |
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
33 |
>> |
34 |
> |
35 |
> I'd do that myself, if I was a dev. :P I'd need a developer to help me |
36 |
> proxy maintain it. I've been meaning to become a developer, but my |
37 |
> ebuild quiz is out of date and I have a lot of IRL things going on right |
38 |
> now so I can't really work toward it right now. spacefm's developer is |
39 |
> on hiatus, so it'd be a good low-traffic package for me to maintain and |
40 |
> take the load (if only mental) off of other developers. |
41 |
> |
42 |
> |