| 1 |
On Saturday 02 July 2005 22:09, Dan Armak wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Saturday 02 July 2005 22:41, Gregorio Guidi wrote: |
| 3 |
> [...] |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > An application based on Qt4 should look just like this: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > inherit qt4 |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > HOMEPAGE=... |
| 10 |
> > SRC_URI=... |
| 11 |
> > ... |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> [...] |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> > This proposal is meant for Qt, but it should be read as a proposal for |
| 16 |
> > both Qt and KDE: we can have a kde4.eclass and a kde4-info.eclass that |
| 17 |
> > work in the same way. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I know you know this, but for other readers, this is exactly the design of |
| 20 |
> the current kde.eclass+kde-functions.eclass :-) At least it was until they |
| 21 |
> gathered up a huge amount of special cases and backward support. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Exactly, in fact this should be reassumed also as "kde eclass started from |
| 24 |
scratch, without the evil need-kde()" :) |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives