| 1 |
On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 19:36 -0400, Travis Tilley wrote: |
| 2 |
> uhhh.... right. who died and made you -GOD-? if you dont fix a bug personally, |
| 3 |
> someone else will. and some other dev will commit it (like me). and you will |
| 4 |
> bitch, of course, since we touched your ebuilds. but jesus... to threaten |
| 5 |
> someone with a broken stable by refusing to care. *shakes head* |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
No, you are forcing us not to care, because we will get those bugs & we |
| 8 |
do. And that is only because certain 'arch maintainers' move things to |
| 9 |
stable that are not. |
| 10 |
And the whole herds deal got instated because control is needed by a |
| 11 |
group of people, we're not in the time anymore that everybody touched |
| 12 |
every other ebuild. And actually amd64 has already proven over time that |
| 13 |
their fixes broke other arches : remember gtkmm & related packages |
| 14 |
(#44409), again here the gnome team reacted in time to prevent it from |
| 15 |
becoming a big problem. So as far as package maintenance goes, i do |
| 16 |
prefer _all_ changes to be at least relayed to the relevant herd(s). |
| 17 |
Arches adding fixes for all arches without the maintaining herd knowing, |
| 18 |
no please not. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
- foser |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
PS. Again you attack me personally, I would prefer if you could keep it |
| 23 |
more professional. I don't need you to like me, but I do deserve your |
| 24 |
respect. |
Archives