| 1 |
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 08:02:57 +0100 |
| 2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> First, standardise sets. We probably want to go with a format along |
| 5 |
> the lines of: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> eapi = 4 |
| 8 |
> description = Monkeys |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
A 'type' field would be useful as well, to support various kinds of |
| 11 |
package sets (much like portage handles currently). |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> dev-monkey/howler |
| 14 |
> dev-monkey/spider |
| 15 |
> >=dev-monkey/spanky-2.0 |
| 16 |
> dev-monkey/squirrel |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
We'd either want to add || ( ) here, or somehow explicitly specify that |
| 19 |
this is a one-of set. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> Second, make a bunch of sets named kde-tag, editors-tag, xml-tag, |
| 22 |
> monkeys-tag etc. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I'd go with prefix, not suffix. Should be easier group them together |
| 25 |
then. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> Disadvantages: doesn't use some horribly convoluted system of XML, |
| 28 |
> wikis and web 2.0. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
And introduces another dedicated file format the PM has to implement |
| 31 |
from scratch. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Best regards, |
| 35 |
Michał Górny |
Archives