1 |
On 08/18/2016 06:21 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:13:14 -0400 |
3 |
> Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> If you just check your packages occassionally to make sure they build |
6 |
>> with gold it completely achieves the goal, and it will actually result |
7 |
>> in fewer bugs using the non-gold linker as well. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> |
10 |
> That's what a tinderbox is for. The only QA problem I see here is that |
11 |
> QA doesn't automate that kind of checks anymore since Diego left. Maybe |
12 |
> QA should ask Toralf to run a ld.gold tinderbox and avoid asking people |
13 |
> to randomly test random packages ? |
14 |
> |
15 |
I dunno, if testing packages that one maintains is as simple as |
16 |
reconfiguring a package, testing, and switching back then I don't think |
17 |
it's unreasonable to ask us to test our own packages. We're supposed to |
18 |
do that already, and for packages whose dependencies aren't 100% hashed |
19 |
out, it can help us figure out what the real deps are. |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer |
23 |
OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net |
24 |
fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6 |