1 |
On Thursday 24 August 2006 09:54, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
> The council doesn't actually do anything AFAICT, it just "approves" GLEP |
3 |
> decisions that have already been made. So in effect we have no leadership. |
4 |
|
5 |
Well, to quote the council project page: |
6 |
|
7 |
"The elected Gentoo Council decides on global issues and policies that affect |
8 |
multiple projects in Gentoo." |
9 |
|
10 |
and from GLEP 19 |
11 |
|
12 |
"Global issues will be decided by an elected Gentoo council." |
13 |
|
14 |
So yes, the council is not elected to rule into decisions of single Gentoo |
15 |
project decisions, unless it affects Gentoo globally. What "global issues" |
16 |
are can be argued about, though. Personally I see the council as our body to |
17 |
make decisions and wouldn't disagree to reword the base on which the council |
18 |
acts to give them explicitly the power to decide on whatever they feel they |
19 |
have to, if necessary - except being bound to have to be re-elected. |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
I'm not as long on board as you Donnie, but I don't think you're right with |
23 |
your implicit call that we need a benevolant dictator. There's simply no |
24 |
evidence, that this model would have done better with Gentoo's growth. I have |
25 |
at least one big point I could list, what went wrong, while Daniel Robbins |
26 |
was the lead. Ask me privately, if you're interested what I mean. I don't |
27 |
want to let others look bad or be the source of flaming. |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
Carsten |