| 1 |
On Friday 02 June 2006 00:33, Mark Loeser wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> said: |
| 3 |
> > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even |
| 4 |
> > vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole |
| 5 |
> > Gentoo dev list to see. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> As I requested in an earlier email, I would like it to be discussed how |
| 8 |
> we want to handle alternative package managers. The GLEPs both touch on |
| 9 |
> the issue, but if neither of those proposals are liked, then we are |
| 10 |
> still left not knowing what to do. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Here is my original email: |
| 13 |
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/38231 |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> As I said in my email, I want there to be a discussion (and hopefully a |
| 16 |
> decision) as to whether or not adding these packages to *our* tree is |
| 17 |
> best for us and our users. In my opinion, it seems to make the most |
| 18 |
> sense for alternative package managers to be hosted on their own |
| 19 |
> infrastructure so they are free to introduce new features and write |
| 20 |
> ebuilds to take advantage of those features. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> If it is required for me to be present at the meeting to discuss this (I |
| 23 |
> don't believe I have to be), then could whoever does the scheduling get |
| 24 |
> in touch with me, because it will be difficult for me to be here during |
| 25 |
> the day since I just started a new job. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I support this request, and in return am willing to incorporate suggestions by |
| 28 |
the council into my GLEP. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Paul |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 34 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 35 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 36 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives