Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gee, wouldn't it be nice (security bugs)...
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:19:44
Message-Id: 43A02965.7040306@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gee, wouldn't it be nice (security bugs)... by Mike Frysinger
1 Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 06:00:21AM -0500, Michael Cummings wrote:
3 >
4 >>Gee, wouldn't it be nice for us lazy folks if the word [Security] (in
5 >>some common fashion) were included in the summary line of security
6 >>related bugs?
7 >
8 >
9 > this really should have been sent to the security mailing list and
10 > cc-ed the security team
11 >
12 > this has come up before on those lists, i just dont remember the
13 > outcome :P
14
15 Don't forget about jforman!
16
17 --
18 Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o>
19 Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
20
21 ---
22 GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
23 Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742
24
25 ramereth/irc.freenode.net

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gee, wouldn't it be nice (security bugs)... Thierry Carrez <koon@g.o>