| 1 |
On Sunday, 7. October 2007, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10/7/07, Robert Buchholz <rbu@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Friday, 5. October 2007, Olivier Crête wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Fri, 2007-05-10 at 11:46 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > How many packages depend on virtual/editor? Should it be a |
| 6 |
> > > > virtual at all? |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > <Tester_> !rdep virtual/editor |
| 9 |
> > > <jeeves> virtual/editor <- app-admin/sudo sys-process/fcron |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > > I think the answer is none that really should, I would favor just |
| 12 |
> > > removing virtual/editor. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > A lot more applications need it, see subversion and cvs, which |
| 15 |
> > invoke $EDITOR. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I think you missed the train when someone mentioned we put an editor |
| 18 |
> in system, thus making one always available. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I thought this discussion was going into a direction that had the system |
| 21 |
dependency removed. I guess I was mistaking. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Robert |
Archives