1 |
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 07:49:49 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I think we've passed the threshold for making two USE flags global: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> - sound notification support (usually via libcanberra) |
7 |
> |
8 |
> - global hotkey support (usually via keybinder) |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I don't have a strong opinion on flag names. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> For sound notification, I've found that: |
14 |
> |
15 |
> - 7 packages use "libcanberra" as the name |
16 |
> |
17 |
> - 1 package uses "sound-notification" (and implements it using |
18 |
> libcanberra) |
19 |
> |
20 |
|
21 |
USE=sound-notification is nice and descriptive, but it feels a bit |
22 |
awkward being so long. Looking at some of the descriptions for the |
23 |
"libcanberra" flag on p.g.o, the most popular one seems to be: |
24 |
|
25 |
Enable sound event support using media-libs/libcanberra |
26 |
|
27 |
Perhaps USE=sound-events? It's a bit shorter but just as descriptive. |
28 |
|
29 |
> |
30 |
> For global hotkey support, I've found that: |
31 |
> |
32 |
> - 4 packages use "keybinder" |
33 |
> |
34 |
> - 1 package uses "hotkeys" but it doesn't use keybinder and I'm not 100% |
35 |
> sure it's the same feature |
36 |
> |
37 |
|
38 |
Maybe something like USE=keybind? |
39 |
|
40 |
These names are also nice and implementation-agnostic :) |
41 |
|
42 |
- Oskari |