| 1 |
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 23:53:07 -0500 |
| 2 |
Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 07/11/2010 02:50 PM, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) wrote: |
| 5 |
> > -LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1" |
| 6 |
> > +LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 ${LDFLAGS}" |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> My existing, custom, entry for LDFLAGS breaks with this change. Not nice. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> %% grep LDFLAGS /etc/make.conf |
| 11 |
> LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS},--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--as-needed" |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> -Jeremy |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Um, why would you have it set to that? It's only coincidence that it worked |
| 16 |
up until now. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--as-needed" |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The reason it changed is because -Wl,--as-needed was added to the dev profile |
| 21 |
and LDFLAGS doesn't stack. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
fonts, gcc-porting, and it's all by design |
| 26 |
toolchain, wxwidgets to keep us from losing our minds |
| 27 |
@ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives