Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: axs@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 21:53:15
Message-Id: 20140723000532.7b6afaa2@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps by Ian Stakenvicius
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 16:41:39 -0400
5 Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> wrote:
6
7 > I wonder if there may be some form of extension we could add to
8 > portage, such that it could do a VDB-only "re-emerge" somehow, when
9 > the in-tree ebuild doesn't match the in-VDB one. If that could be
10 > implemented properly (and i'm not sure that it could, tbh), maybe that
11 > would help reduce issues with dynamic deps, too...
12
13 Hmm, dynamic dependencies ... dynamic rebuilds ... dynamic compilation;
14 one day we will have hot code pushes where upstream changes immediately
15 reflects itself upon one's system. Does such a gimmick succeed? Meteor!
16
17 - --
18 With kind regards,
19
20 Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
21 Gentoo Developer
22
23 E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
24 GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
25 GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
26 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
27 Version: GnuPG v2
28
29 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTzuAsAAoJEPWZc8roOL/QNYsH/1uJrazScukDYnGj3lsPkl7P
30 5l7l7caugq5CwFfJ+VLZR5byV6MePBff+rJsO6Ch8v4yM+h+IFnOn7pLS27Oqm71
31 LRaGHeTH/pge3jq9mm53b7ABi2IjuNSKIr69/loYMJaNgHQLZCtR/wFVxKR3XFrA
32 dhJN7WKhHAG0+1HRlNWCdYpHllG+cmayLARlwfWGbZii/OZWh0eAVEUV0pFdZwlP
33 WaeOcnLebn+TFWPyKEkGKkmz7yI7fFMaoKBueEAZ9PwEUmhdSK5PEeY2U/OpLOA7
34 7wOYDe9J1k04q5DwLzZe9LvqjwjYtGIP4sL1/b+9TCw59+akKC+DmnDv67vuTHs=
35 =wV/h
36 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Jan Matejka <yac@g.o>