1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
3 |
|
4 |
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 16:41:39 -0400
|
5 |
Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> wrote:
|
6 |
|
7 |
> I wonder if there may be some form of extension we could add to |
8 |
> portage, such that it could do a VDB-only "re-emerge" somehow, when |
9 |
> the in-tree ebuild doesn't match the in-VDB one. If that could be |
10 |
> implemented properly (and i'm not sure that it could, tbh), maybe that |
11 |
> would help reduce issues with dynamic deps, too... |
12 |
|
13 |
Hmm, dynamic dependencies ... dynamic rebuilds ... dynamic compilation;
|
14 |
one day we will have hot code pushes where upstream changes immediately
|
15 |
reflects itself upon one's system. Does such a gimmick succeed? Meteor!
|
16 |
|
17 |
- --
|
18 |
With kind regards,
|
19 |
|
20 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
|
21 |
Gentoo Developer
|
22 |
|
23 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
|
24 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
|
25 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
|
26 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
27 |
Version: GnuPG v2
|
28 |
|
29 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTzuAsAAoJEPWZc8roOL/QNYsH/1uJrazScukDYnGj3lsPkl7P
|
30 |
5l7l7caugq5CwFfJ+VLZR5byV6MePBff+rJsO6Ch8v4yM+h+IFnOn7pLS27Oqm71
|
31 |
LRaGHeTH/pge3jq9mm53b7ABi2IjuNSKIr69/loYMJaNgHQLZCtR/wFVxKR3XFrA
|
32 |
dhJN7WKhHAG0+1HRlNWCdYpHllG+cmayLARlwfWGbZii/OZWh0eAVEUV0pFdZwlP
|
33 |
WaeOcnLebn+TFWPyKEkGKkmz7yI7fFMaoKBueEAZ9PwEUmhdSK5PEeY2U/OpLOA7
|
34 |
7wOYDe9J1k04q5DwLzZe9LvqjwjYtGIP4sL1/b+9TCw59+akKC+DmnDv67vuTHs=
|
35 |
=wV/h
|
36 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |