| 1 |
On Samstag, 12. Oktober 2019 18:02:28 CEST William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 01:11:49PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sat, 2019-10-12 at 13:00 +0200, David Seifert wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > * Some distros have not just merged / and /usr, they |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > have also merged /usr/bin and /usr/sbin. By giving |
| 7 |
> > > users the choice of merging */bin and */sbin, |
| 8 |
> > > Gentoo follows suit. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > What about the scenario when /bin has been merged with /usr/sbin |
| 11 |
> > and /sbin with /usr/bin? ;-P |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I also don't see the need for something like this. The idea of the /usr |
| 14 |
> merge is to have all binaries available in one place, and there really |
| 15 |
> is not a good justification for separating bin from sbin. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Do I read this correctly? USE=-split-usr currently means that /bin, /sbin, / |
| 18 |
usr/bin and /usr/sbin point to the same directory? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
If that is not the case, then I agree that users should have the possibility |
| 21 |
to set it up like this and USE=-split-sbin should be supported. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
--Dennis |
Archives