1 |
Michael Orlitzky posted on Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:20:10 -0500 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 12/16/2012 12:02 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
4 |
>> On 16-12-2012 11:57:35 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
5 |
>>> 3. Get off CVS for Christ's sake. Nobody wants to work with that. |
6 |
>>> I don't know how this fits into my bullet list, but it's important. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> It doesn't, and it's not. |
9 |
>> |
10 |
> I'm not going to put together a powerpoint presentation for you, but |
11 |
> think about it this way. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Many new developers who want to contribute to to some project will learn |
14 |
> git, because a large number of important projects use git. No (new) |
15 |
> developers are going to learn CVS. Ever. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Therefore, we can rule out "using CVS is helping us attract new |
18 |
> developers." |
19 |
|
20 |
I agree getting off of CVS is important in that it's likely triggering a |
21 |
writeoff of gentoo from the list of potential volunteers before they even |
22 |
get to where we see them, but AFAIK, the switch to git /is/ making (slow) |
23 |
progress. One of the big blockers was apparently taken care of via |
24 |
bounty (relatively) recently, and I don't think they'd have spent the |
25 |
money on that if they believed it to be pouring that money down a rathole. |
26 |
|
27 |
Before finding out about that, I too had despaired of the git transition |
28 |
being anything but "bluesky", but that's concrete indication that |
29 |
/somebody/ is still working on it, and that it's considered important |
30 |
enough for the gentoo foundation to spend money on. |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
Meanwhile, I'm not sure how practical your bounty for recruiting spruceup |
34 |
is, since much of that work's likely to require intimate knowledge of |
35 |
gentoo and recruiting to approve, if not to actually do, and that level |
36 |
of knowledge is apparently in short supply, or recruiting wouldn't be the |
37 |
bottleneck it seems to be. |
38 |
|
39 |
I don't know how important a general gentoo web page redesign might be (I |
40 |
think what's there is perfectly functional and great), but you're |
41 |
certainly correct on the content itself; anything still mentioning |
42 |
looking for openings in the weekly newsletter is... anachronistic I think |
43 |
is the term. Have you checked for and filed if necessary, a bug on that? |
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
47 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
48 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |