| 1 |
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:16:41 +0100 |
| 2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > Because certainly |
| 4 |
> > > project that is created plainly for political reasons is better. |
| 5 |
> > > Because it will certainly be technically better if people have to |
| 6 |
> > > focus on copying regular udev maintainers and reworking their |
| 7 |
> > > changes to keep them working on forked codebase. |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > And after all, as someone said, this will give eudev proper |
| 10 |
> > > testing. |
| 11 |
> > (1) It's already used by lots of people |
| 12 |
> > (2) 'proper' testing? As opposed to be the default in more than a |
| 13 |
> > dozen distros that have usecases you and I rarely think of? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Are you really serious with those fringe distros? How many of them |
| 16 |
> have a dozen users that do not happen to be developers of the distro? |
| 17 |
> How many of them are actually used in production? How many of them |
| 18 |
> have diverse enough userbase to prove that eudev works in different |
| 19 |
> environments? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
by that type of argument, we should really all be using android :) |
Archives