1 |
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 05:48 +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: |
2 |
> I've filed a bug[1] requesting that ebuilds with updated apache stuff |
3 |
> (anything using the new apache-module or depend.apache eclass/the new install |
4 |
> layout) be package.mask'd due to the regressions and breakages in testing. I |
5 |
> may have missed packages in the bug, hence this mail - you know best if your |
6 |
> using new stuff. :) |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Please package.mask said ebuilds ASAP so we can get apache itself into |
9 |
> package.mask. |
10 |
|
11 |
Even though I stated my opinion that I would like to see the new changes |
12 |
package masked again, the consensus that I read on the thread disagreed |
13 |
with that approach. |
14 |
|
15 |
My unsolicited opinion based upon the previous thread is since it is |
16 |
already out of the bag, leave it in ~arch and actively work the bugs so |
17 |
that you can get it to the point of being able to mark it stable. |
18 |
|
19 |
Regards, |
20 |
Paul |
21 |
-- |
22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |