1 |
On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 08:55:05 -0600 Gordon Pettey wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> |
3 |
> wrote: |
4 |
[...] |
5 |
> > OK, let's say "should", or ever better explain details, e.g.: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > All newly created categories should follow "group-qualificator" |
8 |
> > pattern, a name without hyphen is allowed for a "virtual" category |
9 |
> > and for compatibility reasons in overlays. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> |
12 |
> If PMS is going to specify that, there ought to be better reasoning then |
13 |
> "that's how it's always been done." What concrete benefit is there to |
14 |
> _requiring_ hyphenated categories? |
15 |
|
16 |
Let's not mix different issues together: problems are much easier |
17 |
to solve with "divide and conqueror" approach than with "pile up |
18 |
and suffocate". PMS already have a statement about hyphen and all I |
19 |
want is to make it clearer. |
20 |
|
21 |
Why we have this requirement is another story. I'm not a PMS author |
22 |
thus I can't give you an authoritative answer here. The standard |
23 |
job is not to describe *why*, but to describe *how*. |
24 |
|
25 |
As for why, IMO it makes it easier to navigate through the list of |
26 |
categories. At least it was that way for me when I started to use |
27 |
Gentoo. |
28 |
|
29 |
Best regards, |
30 |
Andrew Savchenko |