Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New system to replace USE flags
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:42:14
Message-Id: 01071920392401.00589@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] New system to replace USE flags by Daniel Robbins
1 On Thursday 19 July 2001 08:15, you wrote:
2 > On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 07:36:08AM +0300, Dan Armak wrote:
3 > > No, No! This is a proprosition to *replace* USE flags. Thre will be
4 > > *only* With flags.
5 >
6 > I see no reason to replace USE variables when they can be extended in a
7 > backwards-compatible manner.
8 >
9 > > If I want to add a flag to make.*, it gives 2 benefits: 1. The user can
10 > > customize it in make.conf. 2. It can be part of a group, which can give
11 > > the user more info and a better default choice in a Which selection.
12 >
13 > We already have plans to add groups to USE variables, and a few other
14 > extensions. And there's no reason to replace the current USE system with
15 > another one just to add an interactive mode. Why destroy months of work
16 > we've already completed when the "With" system doesn't give us anything
17 > special? I really don't see the point of "With" variables. I don't think
18 > you've clearly explained or convinced me *why* we need them. Everything
19 > you want is possible with the new USE system.
20 I didn't mean "replace" them in that sense. I called the new system With
21 flags to differentiate it from exsiting USE flags. You can call them USE or
22 anything else. I don't mind extending the existing system, it's better than
23 building from scratch, as long as hte result is capable of doing the things I
24 suggested. Likewise the specific syntax examples I gave: I don't say it has
25 to be like that, I'm just giving an example.
26
27
28 --
29
30 Dan Armak
31 Gentoo Linux Developer
32 Matan, Israel