1 |
On 11/03/2015 04:04 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
2 |
> Matt Turner schrieb: |
3 |
>> The git transition had been 9 years in the making and has massively |
4 |
>> improved Gentoo development. Look at the graph of contributions per |
5 |
>> month: https://www.openhub.net/p/gentoo |
6 |
> |
7 |
> I'd like to point out that some stuff that has previously been done in a |
8 |
> single commit is now several commits (e.g. bump + removal of old |
9 |
> version). |
10 |
|
11 |
1. not all developers do that and I'd go so far to say that we shouldn't |
12 |
dictate these detail too much. It has advantages, yes, but it doesn't |
13 |
really break anything. |
14 |
|
15 |
2. if you follow the github PRs you will clearly notice that people have |
16 |
started to actively contribute in a way that wasn't possible on bugzilla |
17 |
in the same way... there are no hard numbers, but as someone who had |
18 |
been following the maintainer-wanted/needed aliases, I am pretty sure |
19 |
the amount of contributions has increased considerably. You can also ask |
20 |
the proxy-maintainers team, which has all hands full merging PRs. |
21 |
|
22 |
So yes, git has improved the number of collaborations. It's hard to not |
23 |
notice, unless you really don't want to notice. |