Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Tim Harder <radhermit@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 18:41:19
In Reply to: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date by "Andreas K. Huettel"
1 On 2011-12-16 Fri 06:05, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
2 > > That said, there is probably room for debate over the length of time
3 > > we leave the bug open. Maybe a week isn't quite long enough - maybe
4 > > two weeks is better.
6 When you do timeout a bug and assign it to arches, it would be great if
7 you could assign it to *all* previously stable arches, not just x86 and
8 amd64.
10 I've reopened a few timed out bugs to add missing arches so arch teams
11 can either drop keywords or stabilize. That way the tree as a whole can
12 slowly improve rather then just letting x86/amd64 rocket ahead while
13 having to keep all the old and often deprecated packages around anyway
14 for all the other stable arches.
16 Thanks,
17 Tim