| 1 |
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 12:04 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 2 |
> Would it be OK if I change |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> [- ] profile - Adds support for software performance analysis (will |
| 5 |
> likely vary from ebuild to ebuild) |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> To |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> [- ] profile - Adds support for software performance analysis |
| 10 |
> (WARNING: DON'T ENABLE UNLESS YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING.) |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Or something similar? Suggestions welcome. People seem to add it |
| 13 |
> randomly in combination with -fomit-frame-pointer which breaks with -pg |
| 14 |
> as expected. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Note that -fomit-frame-pointer is the default with stable gcc (4.3 at |
| 17 |
least) on many architectures - some of those that can still debug with |
| 18 |
gdb without frame pointers thanks to location lists generated to debug |
| 19 |
sections by default with -g on those platforms. This includes at least |
| 20 |
amd64, and I believe x86. |
| 21 |
However it might not default enable in combination with -pg, not sure |
| 22 |
about that. Lets say this is a call for testing that, as combinatory |
| 23 |
CFLAGS enabling -fomit-frame-pointer is your reasoning here. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Mart Raudsepp |
| 27 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 28 |
Mail: leio@g.o |
| 29 |
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio |
Archives