| 1 |
Does someone who is primarily working on (for arguents sake) |
| 2 |
Translations does not nessessarily "know what they are doing" in terms |
| 3 |
of overall gentoo dev. My impression is that they have voting |
| 4 |
privileges. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
My feeling is that people who know about TopicA will vote on things that |
| 7 |
relate to that Topic and refrain from voting on things of which they |
| 8 |
have little or no knowledge of. SO why the big argument |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Lares |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 13:22 +0200, Simon Stelling wrote: |
| 13 |
> Homer Parker wrote: |
| 14 |
> > On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 04:14 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> >>| voting previleges |
| 17 |
> >> |
| 18 |
> >>Again, why? They have not yet demonstrated their understanding of |
| 19 |
> >>complex technical issues. Voting should be restricted to people who |
| 20 |
> >>know what they're doing. Arch testers have not yet proven themselves. |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > I don't remember that being asked for... |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> As the GLEP asks to make the ATs staff, it'd imply giving them voting privileges. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> -- |
| 28 |
> Simon Stelling |
| 29 |
> Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Co-Lead |
| 30 |
> blubb@g.o |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives