Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Rolf Eike Beer <eike@×××××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Keywordreqs and slacking arch teams
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 23:35:23
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Keywordreqs and slacking arch teams by Mike Pagano
Am Freitag, 3. Januar 2020, 00:25:06 CET schrieb Mike Pagano:
> On Thursday, January 2, 2020 3:32:12 PM EST Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > > > - Allowed a simple "Add keyword(s) <y..> for package <x>" interface, > > > > > > that intelligently created an issue and a target list, and then once > > > the list was built, constantly ensured the list to be valid, or > > > determined automatically when sub-work was completed and reducing the > > > published list automatically, and then responded to potential issues > > > based on changes in git, ( as opposed to being only triggered when > > > the bug was touched ) > > > > As someone who does both keywordings and stabilizations regularly on hppa > > > and sparc I think I must share a bit of my experiences: > <snip> > > hppa is making us keep old kernels around [1]. Should the kernel team be > doing more to get your attention then CC'ing hppa on all of the kernel > STABLEREQ bugs [2]?
I only run vanilla-sources since there are still lot of cache corruption problems in hppa kernels, or whatever makes them flaky. Linux pioneer 5.4.6-parisc64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 27 10:23:09 CET 2019 parisc64 PA8800 (Mako) 9000/785/C8000 GNU/Linux Linux voyager 5.4.6-parisc #1 Fri Dec 27 15:46:43 CET 2019 parisc PA8600 (PCX- W+) 9000/785/C3600 GNU/Linux So _I_ personally would say just drop old kernels, but that is in no way authorative. Eike


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Keywordreqs and slacking arch teams Michael 'veremitz' Everitt <gentoo@×××××××.xyz>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Keywordreqs and slacking arch teams Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o>