| 1 |
On wto, 2017-07-25 at 16:31 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 07/25/2017 04:29 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > I don't feel I should be obligated by policy to support this use case. |
| 5 |
> > One revbump per push seems sufficiently safe for 99.9% of users. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > If you want to do more revbumps, you are free to do so. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Can I also delete packages and break the tree so long as I put |
| 11 |
> everything back before I push? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
That is not the same, and you know that. Plus, there's a major |
| 14 |
difference between not doing unnecessary work and purposely doing |
| 15 |
something awful just to prove a point. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Best regards, |
| 19 |
Michał Górny |
Archives