| 1 |
On Wednesday 14 August 2002 03:54, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Paul wrote: |
| 3 |
> > However, I see that the policy seems to be to rip |
| 4 |
> > out any reference to my name/email, and slap a Gentoo Copyright |
| 5 |
> > on them. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> This is plain wrong. Unless you have been contacted and agreed |
| 8 |
> specifically to this, the developer has made a boo-boo. Ripping our the |
| 9 |
> copyright is stealing. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Then I might have been the one making a boo-boo. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Paul; I committed your udftools ebuild the other day, is that the one in |
| 14 |
question? What I did was ripping out the "Author:" note in the ebuild and |
| 15 |
putting your name in the ChangeLog in stead, there was never any copyright |
| 16 |
statement (not that I've seen anyway, please correct me if I'm wrong). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Here's the ebuild I committed: |
| 19 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=2903 |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
If that's not what you were referring to, or if I'm just plain wrong, I'm |
| 22 |
truely sorry. Gentoo wouldn't be anything without users submitting ebuilds. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Best Regards, |
Archives