Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Karl Trygve Kalleberg <karltk@×××××××.no>
To: Ernst Lehmann <lehmann@×××××××××××××××.de>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of signed e-build-scripts
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 10:27:20
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.3.96.1020831172502.17658A-100000@pluto.prosalg.no
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Status of signed e-build-scripts by Ernst Lehmann
1 On 30 Aug 2002, Ernst Lehmann wrote:
2
3 > some time ago, there was a discussion about crytographicaly signing the
4 > E-build-scripts, so that the information and there stored md-5 checksums
5 > are better secured againts modification or injection of trojans and so
6 > on.
7
8 This will not be handled before 1.4. The attitude seems to be positive to
9 doing proper keysigning, and there has been a lot of good discussion on
10 how the mechanics should be, but we have not had the time to start any
11 proper implementation of it.
12
13 In the end, it'll come down to when the already overworked Portage
14 maintainer(s) can get around to it.
15
16 Kind regards,
17
18 Karl T