Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] app-text/htmltidy: Maintainer Request
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 15:08:00
Message-Id: CAGDaZ_rLP-F4ZR5V_aX1ndrZPyk2K1SwhagnbnraXMcPSuUXKg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] app-text/htmltidy: Maintainer Request by Yury German
1 I'm not a gentoo developer yet (rl drama has majorly lagged me on getting
2 my quizzes done) but if there's a way I can help it I wouldn't mind.
3
4 On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Yury German <blueknight@g.o> wrote:
5
6 > Well a few things need to happen:
7 >
8 > 1. app-text/tidy-html5 - Need to go Stabl
9 > 2. dep and rdep need to be migrated to tidy-html5 and tested.
10 >
11 > Since Patrice (monsieurp) is the maintainer of tidy-html5, do you want
12 > to become maintainer of htmltidy temporarily to help kill it and move to
13 > tidy-html5?
14 >
15 >
16 > On 6/6/16 10:41 AM, Raymond Jennings wrote:
17 > > If tidy-html5 can take care of anything htmltidy can, then we can boot
18 > > the latter as obsolete anyhow. Are there any backwards compatibility
19 > > issues if we just punt it and let tidy-html5 take over?
20 > >
21 > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 7:15 AM, Yury German <blueknight@g.o
22 > > <mailto:blueknight@g.o>> wrote:
23 > >
24 > >
25 > >
26 > > On 6/5/16 8:02 PM, Patrice Clement wrote:
27 > > > Sunday 05 Jun 2016 19:39:26, Yury German wrote :
28 > > >> app-text/htmltidy currently has no maintainers. It has a
29 > vulnerability
30 > > >> [Security Bug] filed against it. And a number of other [package
31 > depend
32 > > >> on it]. Is nyone willing to pick it up?
33 > > >>
34 > > >> [Secuity Bug]
35 > > >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561452
36 > > >>
37 > > >> [package depend on it]
38 > > >>
39 > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/genrdeps/dindex/app-text/htmltidy
40 > > >>
41 > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/genrdeps/rindex/app-text/htmltidy
42 > >
43 > > > Don't bother. Have a look at [1], [2] & [3] to find out why.
44 > > >
45 > > > tl;dr
46 > > >
47 > > > htmltidy has got to be culled at some point since it's now
48 > considered obsolete
49 > > > after tidy-html5 entered the tree a little while ago. It's roughly
50 > the same
51 > > > codebase yet it's HTML 5 compliant. Yay!
52 > > >
53 > > > I've been maintaining the latter since its inclusion in the
54 > Portage tree but
55 > > > would definitely need help to remove the former. I didn't swap
56 > htmltidy for
57 > > > tidy-html5 cause they're two different projects. As you can see
58 > from the links
59 > > > above, htmltidy has a gazillion deps.
60 > > >
61 > > > [1]: http://tidy.sourceforge.net/
62 > > > [2]: http://www.html-tidy.org/
63 > > > [3]: https://github.com/htacg/tidy-html5
64 > > >
65 > >
66 > > This is all agreed, but unless someone is driving this it will never
67 > get
68 > > removed from tree. The security patch is one thing, but cleaning it
69 > up
70 > > and switching to tidy-html5 is why we need a maintainer so that we
71 > can
72 > > get rid of the dependencies otherwise it will sit there unsecured for
73 > > the next 5 years.
74 > >
75 > >
76 > >
77 >
78 >