| 1 |
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 00:31:41 -0400 |
| 2 |
Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> So apparently they suck, anyone have a new shiny idea on how to group |
| 5 |
> packages and maintaining developers? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
We could be boring and change "herd" to "packagegroup". |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
We could require that a herd mail alias be maintained for every herd, |
| 10 |
with the same name as the herd, such that the herd alias lists the |
| 11 |
maintainers of all packages in the herd. The list could include |
| 12 |
project aliases and/or individuals. Then bug-wranglers can assign to |
| 13 |
the relevant herd alias if no maintainer is listed in metadata, and let |
| 14 |
the herd maintainers re-assign amongst themselves if appropriate. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Kevin F. Quinn |
Archives