| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 19/09/12 03:37 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:26:44 -0400 Alexandre Rostovtsev |
| 6 |
> <tetromino@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> Pacho Ramos has suggested making vala_src_prepare() into a no-op |
| 8 |
>> in the common situation where vala is in IUSE and USE=-vala. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> There's no way to obtain the effective value of IUSE from within |
| 11 |
> an ebuild or eclass. You'll need to use an independent variable to |
| 12 |
> get this information. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I don't think that the 'effective' value of IUSE matters in this |
| 16 |
particular case. This would be the 'explicit' value as is hard-coded |
| 17 |
in the ebuild that would need to be checked against, I expect? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Unless eclasses and phase functions are in the habit of removing |
| 20 |
entries from IUSE, I don't see this being an issue? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 23 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlBaLAkACgkQ2ugaI38ACPDeDAD9Ea1CalzAp0poqTh3mTtpwTt8 |
| 26 |
LVu5vNcZF311lIDJDE0A/jibvhrqIbB5Sw9syPvK8I0j97LGOSXPpZcfN9LYKCHF |
| 27 |
=1wDn |
| 28 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives