| 1 |
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:39 AM, Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I have no idea why we are even discussing the choice of default for |
| 5 |
> virtual/udev to have subdiscussions about kdbus. Practically everyone on |
| 6 |
> the list thinks eudev is the best choice. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I think a lot of us appreciate that eudev exists as a lifeboat or backup |
| 10 |
plan, but want to wait until there's a real, obvious, technical reason to |
| 11 |
switch. MOST of the reasons given have just been vague predictions of |
| 12 |
future doom and gloom. And if we dare ask for more technical reasons, we |
| 13 |
get berated for being a "systemd lover". |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
"Let's wait until udev becomes unusable" doesn't seem that unreasonable to |
| 16 |
me, and it has nothing to do with being pro or anti systemd. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-Ben |
Archives