Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] go-module.eclass: introduce new eclass to handle go modules | ||
| Date: | Thu, 19 Sep 2019 01:02:40 | ||
| Message-Id: | e4744185-c100-c7da-ab48-5f58f9ecaec7@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] go-module.eclass: introduce new eclass to handle go modules by William Hubbs |
||
| 1 | On 9/18/19 5:28 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 | >> |
| 3 | >> I don't really understand why you're adding it to *this* eclass. Isn't |
| 4 | >> it true for all Go packages? So I suppose golang-* eclasses are |
| 5 | >> affected as well. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > You are correct, they are affected. No one, including myself, caught |
| 8 | > that during the review cycle for those eclasses. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | I've been bitching about this for at least four years: |
| 11 | |
| 12 | https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/2e89a3ccf9ceb4b61418d0ce30939f92 |