Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:39:55
Message-Id: 20140610213930.0654bd3a77fee84e23958109@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project by Jeroen Roovers
1 On Sat, 7 Jun 2014 23:08:15 +0200 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
2 > On Sat, 07 Jun 2014 15:35:04 -0500
3 > Daniel Campbell <contact@××××××××.us> wrote:
4 >
5 > > > [2]: Overview of bugs that involve OpenRC, most for the package
6 > > > itself. https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=openrc
7 >
8 > > I think working on OpenRC would be a great learning experience for me
9 > > and would be a great opportunity to contribute to Gentoo.
10 >
11 > You can start fixing bugs immediately. You can check out the sources,
12 > write patches and attach the patches to the bug reports. Then all it
13 > takes is someone else to review/commit the patches.
14
15 And who will review patches made? There are already six push
16 requests pending on OpenRC github for a long time:
17 https://github.com/OpenRC/openrc/pulls
18 And some of them are fixing long-standing severe bugs such as
19 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391945 is fixed by:
20 https://github.com/OpenRC/openrc/pull/12
21 https://github.com/OpenRC/openrc/pull/13
22 We tested these patches on our infra and they work fine. Though
23 without upstream accepting/reviewing these changes for a long time
24 all enthusiasm dies slowly...
25
26 I understand that all devs have issues of their own to handle and I
27 don't want to blame anyone due to a lack of time. I just want to
28 point out that lack of contributions is only one side of a problem.
29 Another one is that someone with proper authority should take care
30 of such contributions.
31
32 Best regards,
33 Andrew Savchenko

Replies