1 |
Samuli Suominen wrote: |
2 |
> eclass has ChangeLog file now. any particular reason why you skipped it? |
3 |
|
4 |
Completely oblivious to its existence, that's all :) I'll |
5 |
(hopefully) remember it next time. |
6 |
|
7 |
> or is it not meant to be used yet / not mandatory to use yet? since most |
8 |
> people seem to skip it. |
9 |
|
10 |
In my case it was entirely ignorance, and with no statistical |
11 |
evidence to base my assertion I'll say that most other omissions |
12 |
come from the same cause. |
13 |
|
14 |
Though on the other hand you could argue that a Changelog for all |
15 |
eclasses may be a bit overkill. Most eclasses are not related to |
16 |
one another, so reading the CVS history of the changes to a |
17 |
single file is much more useful than having a big list of |
18 |
unrelated changes. A changelog becomes much more useful when |
19 |
you need to make related commits to multiple files with a |
20 |
non-atomic-commit system like CVS. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Jim Ramsay |
24 |
Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox/fluxbox/gkrellm) |