| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 17/01/13 11:47 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:47:18 -0800 Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |
| 6 |
> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> REPLACING_VERSIONS always refers to packages with identical SLOT |
| 8 |
>> to the current package |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> No it doesn't. If you have foo-1:a and foo-2:b installed, and then |
| 11 |
> you install foo-1:b, it replaces both 1:a and 2:b. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
that would be an interesting case with portage, given if foo-1:a moved |
| 15 |
to foo-1:b that should occur via a slot-move shouldn't it? and |
| 16 |
therefore would end up conflicting with foo-2:b immediately. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
This sort of limits said case to something that should never occur ... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 21 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlD4MX4ACgkQ2ugaI38ACPC2LgEAi70mTJebnH54KiZR2+3BLvCS |
| 24 |
5JXl8GDlogEohdqHZ4wA/2+Cs6I4HqAj7SzWbRMPu9u88PyW2Yg2tPyI0Acv/+/A |
| 25 |
=bFTH |
| 26 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives