| 1 |
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:15:31 -0400 |
| 2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> It might be easier to take smaller steps, such as having a policy that |
| 5 |
> "any call for devs to use/test a new tool/service, or any service that |
| 6 |
> automatically performs transactions on bugzilla, must be FOSS, and the |
| 7 |
> link to the source must be included in the initial communication, and |
| 8 |
> it must be clear what version of the code is operating at any time." |
| 9 |
> That is a pretty low barrier to those creating tools, though it |
| 10 |
> doesn't address the infra concern. However, it does mean that infra |
| 11 |
> is now free to fork the service at any time, and reduces the bus |
| 12 |
> factor greatly. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
For the situation of things that take life before being part of infra, |
| 15 |
I think the least we can do is recognize their utility and importance, |
| 16 |
and at least, have infra *offer* some sort of shared location to run a |
| 17 |
deployment. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
That I think helps everyone, gives people a place to remove their own |
| 20 |
bus factor, but without mandatory strongarming. |
Archives