| 1 |
On 10/12/04 Eldad Zack wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 19:46, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Monday 11 October 2004 18:14, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 01:19, Brian Jackson wrote: |
| 6 |
> > Please also add a check for bzipped gzipped files. CVS doesn't play |
| 7 |
> > nice with them, and neither does rsync. Those shouldn't be in the |
| 8 |
> > tree (except for the rescue portage) |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Why should rescue portage be in the tree? |
| 11 |
> anyway, it's gone. but it might be nice to have it as an ebuild, and |
| 12 |
> slip it in as a system package. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
What would be the point of that? The rescue portage is only a |
| 15 |
pre-packaged version of portage in cases of a corrupted portage install |
| 16 |
where you can't use it anymore. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Marius |
Archives